Dina, an employee of Eagle Industries, is injured in a work-related accident. Based on the diagnosis of Frank,
Saturday, February 27th, 2010 at
4:26 pm
a doctor, Dina accepts $50,000 from Eagle and waives the right to future claims. Frank’s diagnosis later proves to have been wrong. According to the reasoning of the court in Case 10.1, Roberts v. Century Contractors, Inc., Frank’s misdiagnosis is, in terms of its impact on Dina’s agreement with Eagle,
a mutual mistake of fact.
a unilateral mistake of fact.
fraudulent misrepresentation.
nonfraudulent misrepresentation.
I would assume the second one, however, we would need to read the case cited above.
No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
Filed under: Work Accident Claims
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
I would assume the second one, however, we would need to read the case cited above.
References :
Is everyone on here doing your homework for you? How do you know who is right & who isn’t?
The answer is #2
References :
Dina
has to go with number 2.
References :