<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question regarding car insurance and non traffic accident claims?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims</link>
	<description>Updates from the Exciting Field of Personal Injury Law</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 00:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave F</title>
		<link>http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims/comment-page-1#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>Yes, her rates will go up.
You can easily compare how quotes will change in internet, for example here: http://autoinsurance.bebto.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, her rates will go up.<br />
You can easily compare how quotes will change in internet, for example here: <a href="http://autoinsurance.bebto.com" rel="nofollow">http://autoinsurance.bebto.com</a><br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bud68</title>
		<link>http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims/comment-page-1#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>bud68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>At the least, her rates will go up.  More likely, they will drop her.  Her CLUE report will be negatively affected also, which means that other insurers will know of her excessive claim record.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the least, her rates will go up.  More likely, they will drop her.  Her CLUE report will be negatively affected also, which means that other insurers will know of her excessive claim record.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chickie</title>
		<link>http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims/comment-page-1#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>Chickie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>All claims are considered, and even though no other cars were involved in the curb and fence accidents, they would still be considered &#34;traffic&#34; or &#34;collision&#34; accidents and she is considered at fault.  Just these two accidents alone could get her cancelled or at least cause a rate increase, throw in the other accident and the comprehensive claims (windshield, vandalism) and there are very few companies who will want to insure her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All claims are considered, and even though no other cars were involved in the curb and fence accidents, they would still be considered &quot;traffic&quot; or &quot;collision&quot; accidents and she is considered at fault.  Just these two accidents alone could get her cancelled or at least cause a rate increase, throw in the other accident and the comprehensive claims (windshield, vandalism) and there are very few companies who will want to insure her.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbrcatz17</title>
		<link>http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims/comment-page-1#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>mbrcatz17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>Oh, they look at ALL claims.  Most states will allow her insurer to cancel her, for more than two non-glass comprehensive claims, or two at fault accidents (including the fence), or three not at fault accidents, or a combination of these.

Darned tootin' she's going to see a rate increase.  IF she  doesn't flat out get cancelled.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;agent, 21+ years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, they look at ALL claims.  Most states will allow her insurer to cancel her, for more than two non-glass comprehensive claims, or two at fault accidents (including the fence), or three not at fault accidents, or a combination of these.</p>
<p>Darned tootin&#8217; she&#8217;s going to see a rate increase.  IF she  doesn&#8217;t flat out get cancelled.<br /><b>References : </b><br />agent, 21+ years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSAD</title>
		<link>http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims/comment-page-1#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>MSAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>They look at all claims - not just ones involving moving violations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Insurance Adjuster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look at all claims - not just ones involving moving violations.<br /><b>References : </b><br />Insurance Adjuster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims/comment-page-1#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>Honestly, her company is probably already looking at nonrenewing her, even before she files the next at fault accident (the curb accident is at fault &#38; the fence accident will be too - the other car one could be depending on the circumstances) - unless she has Progressive, then she will be charged a whole lot more on her next renewal.
I have one company that will change tiering (charge more) after only 2 comprehensive losses (which are the vandalisms &#38; the glass losses).  
She has 2 collision losses &#38; 3 comprehensive losses.  If she is not with Progressive or other nonstandard carrier now, she will be...&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Insurance agent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, her company is probably already looking at nonrenewing her, even before she files the next at fault accident (the curb accident is at fault &amp; the fence accident will be too - the other car one could be depending on the circumstances) - unless she has Progressive, then she will be charged a whole lot more on her next renewal.<br />
I have one company that will change tiering (charge more) after only 2 comprehensive losses (which are the vandalisms &amp; the glass losses).<br />
She has 2 collision losses &amp; 3 comprehensive losses.  If she is not with Progressive or other nonstandard carrier now, she will be&#8230;<br /><b>References : </b><br />Insurance agent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ontario Insurance Broker</title>
		<link>http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims/comment-page-1#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>Ontario Insurance Broker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stollikerlaw.com/work-accident-claims/question-regarding-car-insurance-and-non-traffic-accident-claims#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>Insurers will not like 5 claims in a year.  There is a good chance her rates will go up or she'll be cancelled at renewal&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;insurance  broker
www.canada-insurance-source.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insurers will not like 5 claims in a year.  There is a good chance her rates will go up or she&#8217;ll be cancelled at renewal<br /><b>References : </b><br />insurance  broker<br />
<a href="http://www.canada-insurance-source.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.canada-insurance-source.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

